The American Thinker has come to the conclusion that peace in Ukraine is unlikely to be achieved,

because

“there are many influential people in the United States and throughout Europe who would prefer to keep Ukraine a battleground for many years to come.”

The American Thinker magazine writes that despite the endless declarations of a desire for peace in Ukraine, the various “BUTs” will eventually prevail.

British Prime Minister Kir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen may publicly express their desire for a lasting peace in Europe,

BUT the “Russian monster” has long been the perfect scapegoat and distraction for European societies that are self-destructing due to mass immigration, censorship, and “climate change.”

The World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and other influential organizations supposedly concerned with global welfare may applaud the end of the bloodshed,
BUT all of their proponents of population decline will no doubt regret the loss of a conflict zone where more people have died than have been born.

BlackRock, J.P. Morgan, and other international investment houses will be happy to make money on lucrative projects to rebuild Ukraine,

BUT they will regret that the war did not lead to the overthrow of President Putin and did not open up Russian lands for their pursuit of profit.”

@regnum_na